Robert Martinez v. State
Opinion
2.7 -rn«rch 2.01s ^5^^ a
C/Oorf &f Cumin)* ( ftjpp^U "Trey C £>er\vte-\V, C\erK
/Wn,0,Ty- ^eilt
boo Doloras* y00 C^loros* J sV |0«P „ en
Re6. 6T^TU5 OF F^^TH AMENDED APPU^Tio/O -B>r WviT o-f habeas
On! (SaO 0\n>. 2.4, 1015", JT ?\at*l \*i ^< &mr Coim-U M>H DeWWl CenW ({5CADc) \dk<^
AppW^icw ^^ Wr.-V cA mb^s £Vpus -for I
\\\t sWWs o-f mv 4ri?r mailed 6< CfuvKj Toorty
3$ pos&ibV pU%« provide me vV'M a Mk 3»*p <7 ^|ui/fO SW* U|<( 4iti /Ol. l> 2joj|ofc
„. J6R/0 OeCla qatuv\ By Ifm ^ a-ie pitched (ftiy^jezj-roci »P*io.f*3/3TJ faenrfc prftfl^ WCd^CcA&Vi l*i "ill? 7*KAS Deft- o^ 6u/t«
PqtfC J 2 MCAJ.C6N i"X. 785 — no^cf yyi&rri/ue'z. 3-1 MAR 2015 PM 1 T .* ~rvzy to u'd fJ3/377 if SXN AN1 .' • '; •' • 2015APR-2. MUIS55 3^ Dolorosa 5w fanhrn'id ~7lK«<, %Zn^ 3-^7 - / r i|ni»iii
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robert Martinez v. State (Robert Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.