Home/Supreme Court/Robert M. Purcell, in Error v. Quaker Realty Company, Limited

Robert M. Purcell, in Error v. Quaker Realty Company, Limited

239 U.S. 635
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 29, 1915
Docket152
StatusPublished

This text of 239 U.S. 635 (Robert M. Purcell, in Error v. Quaker Realty Company, Limited) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert M. Purcell, in Error v. Quaker Realty Company, Limited, 239 U.S. 635 (1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit Co., 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669-670; (2) Ross v. Oregon, 227 U. S. 150, 161 Moore-Mansfield Co. v. Electrical Co., 234 U. S. 619, 624; Wil *636 loughby v. Chicago, 235 U. S. 45; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50.

Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. William Winans Wall for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo v. McConnico
168 U.S. 674 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Ross v. Oregon
227 U.S. 150 (Supreme Court, 1913)
De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore
233 U.S. 24 (Supreme Court, 1914)
McDonald v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.
233 U.S. 665 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Moore-Mansfield Construction Co. v. Electrical Installation Co.
234 U.S. 619 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Willoughby v. City of Chicago
235 U.S. 45 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. City of Cleveland
235 U.S. 50 (Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 U.S. 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-m-purcell-in-error-v-quaker-realty-company-limited-scotus-1915.