Robert M. Purcell, in Error v. Quaker Realty Company, Limited

239 U.S. 635
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 29, 1915·No. 152·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit Co., 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669-670; (2) Ross v. Oregon, 227 U. S. 150, 161 Moore-Mansfield Co. v. Electrical Co., 234 U. S. 619, 624; Wil *636 loughby v. Chicago, 235 U. S. 45; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50.

Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. William Winans Wall for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert M. Purcell, in Error v. Quaker Realty Company, Limited, 239 U.S. 635 (1915).

239 U.S. 635 (Robert M. Purcell, in Error v. Quaker Realty Company, Limited) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. McConnico
168 U.S. 674 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Ross v. Oregon
227 U.S. 150 (Supreme Court, 1913)
De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore
233 U.S. 24 (Supreme Court, 1914)
McDonald v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.
233 U.S. 665 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Willoughby v. City of Chicago
235 U.S. 45 (Supreme Court, 1914)