Robert Franklin v. District of Columbia

168 F.3d 1360, 335 U.S. App. D.C. 60, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8333, 1999 WL 167538
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 22, 1999·No. 97-7162·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellees’ Petition For Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

Circuit Judges WALD and TATEL would grant the suggestion. Their statement is attached.

Separate statement filed by WALD and TATEL, Circuit Judges, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Franklin v. District of Columbia, 168 F.3d 1360, 335 U.S. App. D.C. 60, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8333, 1999 WL 167538 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

168 F.3d 1360 (Robert Franklin v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. U.S. Department of Education
District of Columbia, 2010
Robert Franklin v. District of Columbia
168 F.3d 1360 (D.C. Circuit, 1999)