Robert F. Urbano v. News Syndicate Co., Inc.

358 F.2d 145, 10 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 345, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6893
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 11, 1966
DocketDocket 30354
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 358 F.2d 145 (Robert F. Urbano v. News Syndicate Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert F. Urbano v. News Syndicate Co., Inc., 358 F.2d 145, 10 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 345, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6893 (2d Cir. 1966).

Opinions

HAYS, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff in this libel action moves for leave to proceed in forma pawperis and for assignment of counsel in connection with an appeal from an order dismissing his complaint. We grant the motion for [146]*146leave to proceed on the appeal in forma pauperis and at the same time reverse the order from which the appeal is taken. Our action makes it unnecessary for plaintiff to have counsel assigned for the appeal:

Plaintiff is incarcerated in the New Jersey State Prison at Trenton under a sentence of life imprisonment. He has filed a complaint alleging that the defendant has libeled him and seeking damages for the libel.

The district court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of plaintiff’s incapacity to sue. The district court based its action on New York Penal Law § 511(1) which provides :

“A person sentenced to imprisonment for life is thereafter deemed civilly dead.”

Even if the district court was right in holding that incapacity to sue is a necessary incident of the concept of civil death, it was error to apply the law of New York rather than the law of plaintiff’s domicile as required by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 17(b). There was no showing that under the law of his domicile plaintiff was incapable of suing.

On the merits we are of the opinion, as was the district court, that the complaint is not so clearly frivolous as to justify dismissal “at this stage of the proceeding.”

Application, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted; application for assignment of counsel denied; order reversed and case remanded to the district court with direction to take jurisdiction of the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Muntaqim v. Coombe
449 F.3d 371 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Baker v. Cuomo
842 F. Supp. 718 (S.D. New York, 1993)
Dane v. Board of Registrars of Voters of Concord
371 N.E.2d 1358 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1978)
Claim of Bilello v. A. J. Eckert Co.
42 A.D.2d 243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)
Orville E. Stifel, II v. William F. Hopkins, Esq.
477 F.2d 1116 (Sixth Circuit, 1973)
White v. Fawcett Publications
324 F. Supp. 403 (W.D. Missouri, 1971)
Beishir v. Swenson
331 F. Supp. 1224 (W.D. Missouri, 1970)
Wilson v. Garnett
332 F. Supp. 888 (W.D. Missouri, 1970)
Beyer v. Werner
299 F. Supp. 967 (E.D. New York, 1969)
Briskin v. Glickman
267 F. Supp. 600 (S.D. New York, 1967)
Lombardi v. Peace
259 F. Supp. 222 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Urbano v. Sondern
41 F.R.D. 355 (D. Connecticut, 1966)
Robert F. Urbano v. News Syndicate Co., Inc.
358 F.2d 145 (Second Circuit, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 F.2d 145, 10 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 345, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-f-urbano-v-news-syndicate-co-inc-ca2-1966.