Robert E. Mcandrew v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
This text of 183 F.3d 1290 (Robert E. Mcandrew v. Lockheed Martin Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
183 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 1999)
ROBERT E. MCANDREW, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Successor in Interest to LOCKHEED-AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS
COMPANY, a division of LOCKHEED CORPORATION, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee,
J. A. BLACKWELL, JR., T. A. GRAHAM, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 97-8483
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
August 11, 1999
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:96-CV-1584
(Opinion June 18, 1999, 177 F.3d 1310, 11th Cir., 1999)
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges*.
BY THE COURT :
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 F.3d 1290, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-e-mcandrew-v-lockheed-martin-corporation-ca11-1999.