McAndrew v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

Eleventh Circuit

McAndrew v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

177 F.3d 1310, 1999 WL 401346

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJune 18, 1999

Docket97-8483

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 177 F.3d 1310 (McAndrew v. Lockheed Martin Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McAndrew v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 177 F.3d 1310, 1999 WL 401346 (11th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________________ No. 97-8483 ________________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:96-CV-1584

ROBERT E. MCANDREW, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant- Appellant, versus LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Successor in Interest to LOCKHEED-AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS COMPANY, a division of LOCKHEED CORPORATION, Defendant-Counter-Claimant- Appellee, J. A. BLACKWELL, JR., T. A. GRAHAM, et al., Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _________________________________________________________________

(Opinion June 18, 1999, ____ F.3d ____, 11th Cir., 1999) (August 11, 1999) Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges*. B Y T H E C O U R T : A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED. *Senior U. S. Circuit Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________________ No. 97-8483 ________________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:96-CV-1584

ROBERT E. MCANDREW, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant- Appellant, versus LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Successor in Interest to LOCKHEED-AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS COMPANY, a division of LOCKHEED CORPORATION, Defendant-Counter-Claimant- Appellee, J. A. BLACKWELL, JR., T. A. GRAHAM, et al., Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _________________________________________________________________

(Opinion June 18, 1999, ____ F.3d ____, 11th Cir., 1999) (August 11, 1999) Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges*. B Y T H E C O U R T : A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED. *Senior U. S. Circuit Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 F.3d 1310, 1999 WL 401346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcandrew-v-lockheed-martin-corp-ca11-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack