Robert E. Davis v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Robert E. Davis v. United States

431 F.2d 693

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 14, 1970

Docket25546

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 431 F.2d 693 (Robert E. Davis v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert E. Davis v. United States, 431 F.2d 693 (5th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The principal issue raised on this appeal from conviction and sentence of a narcotics conviction is that the trial court erred in not suppressing the quantity of heroin found in a brown paper bag which had been in appellant’s possession when he was removed from a passenger airplane at the El Paso, Texas airport some five miles from the border. The trial court denied the motion to suppress on the ground that this was a proper “border search” as described in 19 U.S.C.A. § 482.

Although the appellant was not under constant surveillance after he departed the entry point at the border, there was ample basis for the search that was made of him at the airport under the standards stated by this court in Walker v. United States, (5th Cir.) 404 F.2d 900.

As to the contention by the appellant that error was committed by the admission of his testimony of a prior criminal record in the hearing before the trial court out of the presence of the jury in opposition to the appellant’s motion to suppress, we conclude that this evidence was relevant to the establishment of the necessary reasonableness of the suspicion held by the officers in making the § 482 border search. Moreover, even if error was made, it was not substantial in that none of the evidence was heard by the jury.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The principal issue raised on this appeal from conviction and sentence of a narcotics conviction is that the trial court erred in not suppressing the quantity of heroin found in a brown paper bag which had been in appellant’s possession when he was removed from a passenger airplane at the El Paso, Texas airport some five miles from the border. The trial court denied the motion to suppress on the ground that this was a proper “border search” as described in 19 U.S.C.A. § 482.

Although the appellant was not under constant surveillance after he departed the entry point at the border, there was ample basis for the search that was made of him at the airport under the standards stated by this court in Walker v. United States, (5th Cir.) 404 F.2d 900.

As to the contention by the appellant that error was committed by the admission of his testimony of a prior criminal record in the hearing before the trial court out of the presence of the jury in opposition to the appellant’s motion to suppress, we conclude that this evidence was relevant to the establishment of the necessary reasonableness of the suspicion held by the officers in making the § 482 border search. Moreover, even if error was made, it was not substantial in that none of the evidence was heard by the jury.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

431 F.2d 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-e-davis-v-united-states-ca5-1970.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack