Robert Campbell v. Harry J. Altman III

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 17, 2020
DocketA21A0074
StatusPublished

This text of Robert Campbell v. Harry J. Altman III (Robert Campbell v. Harry J. Altman III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Campbell v. Harry J. Altman III, (Ga. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 13, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0074. ROBERT CAMPBELL v. HARRY J. ALTMAN III.

On July 16, 2019, the trial court entered an order denying inmate Robert Campbell’s petition for a writ of mandamus. On March 20, 2020, Campbell filed a notice of appeal to this Court.1 We lack jurisdiction for two reasons. First, while judgments and orders granting or refusing to grant mandamus are generally directly appealable, see OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (7), under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, any appeal in a civil case initiated by a prisoner must come by discretionary application. See OCGA § 42-12-8; Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga. 489, 490 (480 SE2d 24) (1997). Because Campbell is incarcerated, he was required to file an application for discretionary appeal to seek review of the trial court’s order. “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Res., 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Campbell’s failure to follow the proper appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. Second, even if Campbell had a right of direct appeal, this appeal is untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the entry of the trial court’s order. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an

1 Campbell previously attempted to appeal from two other trial court orders disposing of different mandamus petitions against the same defendant. See Case No. A19A2481 (Aug. 5, 2019) (dismissing direct appeal because discretionary application was required); Case No. A20D0076 (Sept. 24, 2019) (dismissing discretionary application as untimely). absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon this Court. Couch v. United Paperworkers Intl. Union, 224 Ga. App. 721, 721 (482 SE2d 704) (1997). Campbell untimely filed his notice of appeal more than nine months after the trial court entered the order he wishes to appeal. For these reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/13/2020 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Townsend
480 S.E.2d 24 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1997)
Couch v. UNITED PAPERWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION
482 S.E.2d 704 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Campbell v. Harry J. Altman III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-campbell-v-harry-j-altman-iii-gactapp-2020.