Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Mead Johnson & Company
This text of 253 F.2d 862 (Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Mead Johnson & Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellee Mead Johnson & Company sought to register its trademark for an edible (or potable) liquid substance called “Fer-in-Sol”, which is used as a dietary supplement. The Patent Office classifies commercial goods, for trademark registration purposes, into some 52 categories or classes (adhesives, fertilizers, vehicles, clothing, etc.). Appellee sought registration for “Fer-in-Sol” in two of these classes, viz., Class 18, Medicines and Pharmaceutical Preparations, and Class 46, Foods and Ingredients of Foods. The Patent Office registered the name in the Medicines and Pharmaceutical Preparations class, but refused to register it in the Foods and Ingredients of Foods class, for the reason that the Patent Office follows the practice of allowing registration in one class only and for the reason that it found “Fer-in-Sol” was not a food. The trial court in a 35 U.S.C. § 145 proceeding, held that a trade-mark may be registered in as many categories as the product’s uses warrant, finding as a fact that the product was reasonably classifiable as a food as well as a pharmaceutical product. We need not decide whether this right is limited, as the trial court suggests, only by the variety of uses. On the record here presented we hold that where a product is in fact a food and a pharmaceutical preparation it may be registered in both classes.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 F.2d 862, 117 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 13, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 340, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-c-watson-commissioner-of-patents-v-mead-johnson-company-cadc-1958.