Robbins v. Mendenhall
35 Ala. 722
Opinion
The only error assigned on this record, is the overruling of the defendants’ demurrer to the complaint. Looking into the demurrer, we find it does not specify any grounds of demurrer, within the spirit of the statute. — Code, § 2253; Burns v. Mayor of Mobile, 34 Ala. 485. The demurrer is but a general one, without specifying any grounds. We cannot consider this as a demurrer under our statute ; and the result is, that the assignment of error raises no question for our consideration.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robbins v. Mendenhall, 35 Ala. 722 (Ala. 1860).
35 Ala. 722 (Robbins v. Mendenhall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Benedict Pineapple Co.
52 Fla. 165 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1906)
Brewer v. Watson
65 Ala. 88 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1880)
Donegan & Tabor v. Wood
49 Ala. 242 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1873)
State v. Gardner
45 Ala. 46 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1871)
Mobile & Ohio R. R. v. Thomas
42 Ala. 672 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1868)
Merritt v. Flemming
42 Ala. 234 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1868)
Harrison v. Nolin
41 Ala. 256 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1867)