Robbins v. Mendenhall

35 Ala. 722
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 35 Ala. 722 (Robbins v. Mendenhall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robbins v. Mendenhall, 35 Ala. 722 (Ala. 1860).

Opinion

STONE, J.

The only error assigned on this record, is the overruling of the defendants’ demurrer to the complaint. Looking into the demurrer, we find it does not specify any grounds of demurrer, within the spirit of the statute. — Code, § 2253; Burns v. Mayor of Mobile, 34 Ala. 485. The demurrer is but a general one, without specifying any grounds. We cannot consider this as a demurrer under our statute ; and the result is, that the assignment of error raises no question for our consideration.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Benedict Pineapple Co.
52 Fla. 165 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1906)
Brewer v. Watson
65 Ala. 88 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1880)
Donegan & Tabor v. Wood
49 Ala. 242 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1873)
State v. Gardner
45 Ala. 46 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1871)
Mobile & Ohio R. R. v. Thomas
42 Ala. 672 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1868)
Merritt v. Flemming
42 Ala. 234 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1868)
Harrison v. Nolin
41 Ala. 256 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1867)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Ala. 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-mendenhall-ala-1860.