Harrison v. Nolin

41 Ala. 256
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BYRD, J.

The court granted a new trial, “ upon hearing all the facts in the case.” The record does not set out the facts upon which the court granted a re-hearing, and we can not therefore say that the court erred in the order made.

2. There was a demurrer to the application, but the record does not show the grounds of demurrer assigned; and in this state of the record, we must presume, in favor of the ruling of the court, that no ground was assigned that was good, or well assigned.—Helvenstein v. Higgason, 35 Ala. 259; Robbins v. Mendenhall, 35 Ala. 722.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrison v. Nolin, 41 Ala. 256 (Ala. 1867).

41 Ala. 256 (Harrison v. Nolin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donegan & Tabor v. Wood
49 Ala. 242 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1873)
James v. Moseley
47 Ala. 299 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1872)
State v. Gardner
45 Ala. 46 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1871)