Harrison v. Nolin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Harrison v. Nolin

41 Ala. 256

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 15, 1867

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 41 Ala. 256 (Harrison v. Nolin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrison v. Nolin, 41 Ala. 256 (Ala. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

BYRD, J.

The court granted a new trial, “ upon hearing all the facts in the case.” The record does not set out the facts upon which the court granted a re-hearing, and we can not therefore say that the court erred in the order made.

2. There was a demurrer to the application, but the record does not show the grounds of demurrer assigned; and in this state of the record, we must presume, in favor of the ruling of the court, that no ground was assigned that was good, or well assigned.—Helvenstein v. Higgason, 35 Ala. 259; Robbins v. Mendenhall, 35 Ala. 722.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BYRD, J.

The court granted a new trial, “ upon hearing all the facts in the case.” The record does not set out the facts upon which the court granted a re-hearing, and we can not therefore say that the court erred in the order made.

2. There was a demurrer to the application, but the record does not show the grounds of demurrer assigned; and in this state of the record, we must presume, in favor of the ruling of the court, that no ground was assigned that was good, or well assigned.—Helvenstein v. Higgason, 35 Ala. 259; Robbins v. Mendenhall, 35 Ala. 722.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Ala. 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-nolin-ala-1867.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack