Roach v. State
This text of 801 P.2d 1037 (Roach v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
[1038]*1038ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
This matter came on before the Court upon a Petition for Writ of Certiorari and Motion for Appointment of Counsel seeking review of a decision of the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District of Campbell County by Petitioner pro se, and the Court having considered the Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Motion for Appointment of Counsel, and the records and files of the Court, and being fully informed, finds that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari and Motion for Appointment of Counsel should be denied because the Petitioner’s right to appeal the decision of the district court constitutes an adequate remedy, and it, therefore, is
ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari and Motion for Appointment of Counsel be, and the same hereby are, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
801 P.2d 1037, 1990 Wyo. LEXIS 141, 1990 WL 182557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roach-v-state-wyo-1990.