Roach v. State

801 P.2d 1037, 1990 Wyo. LEXIS 141, 1990 WL 182557
Wyoming Supreme Court·Decided November 29, 1990·No. 90-282·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

[1038] ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

This matter came on before the Court upon a Petition for Writ of Certiorari and Motion for Appointment of Counsel seeking review of a decision of the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District of Campbell County by Petitioner pro se, and the Court having considered the Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Motion for Appointment of Counsel, and the records and files of the Court, and being fully informed, finds that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari and Motion for Appointment of Counsel should be denied because the Petitioner’s right to appeal the decision of the district court constitutes an adequate remedy, and it, therefore, is

ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari and Motion for Appointment of Counsel be, and the same hereby are, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roach v. State, 801 P.2d 1037, 1990 Wyo. LEXIS 141, 1990 WL 182557 (Wyo. 1990).

801 P.2d 1037 (Roach v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pisano v. Shillinger
835 P.2d 1136 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1992)
Miller v. State
806 P.2d 1308 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1991)
Osborn v. State
806 P.2d 259 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1991)
Roach v. State
801 P.2d 1037 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1990)