RL BB ACQ I-GA CVL, LLC v. WORKMAN, Et Al.
This text of 821 S.E.2d 573 (RL BB ACQ I-GA CVL, LLC v. WORKMAN, Et Al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In
Workman v. RL BB ACQ I-GA, LLC
,
*574
1. Because neither Honey Workman nor any of the Workman LLCs
1
(collectively, the "Third Parties") were parties to the underlying litigation, they were not entitled to an award of attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14 for conduct involved in post-judgment discovery. See
Workman II
,
2. For the reasons explained in
Workman I
, we reverse that part of the trial court's order awarding the Third Parties the expenses and fees they incurred in preparing for and attending Honey Workman's deposition.
Workman I
,
3. Also for the reasons explained in our original opinion, we reverse that part of the trial court's order awarding the Third Parties the expenses they incurred in pursuing their motion for sanctions.
4. We affirm that part of the trial court's order awarding the Third Parties $18,394.63 in attorney fees and costs incurred in obtaining the protective order at issue. See OCGA §§ 9-11-26 (c), 9-11-37 (a) (4) (A) ;
Workman II
,
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Ellington, P. J., and Mercier, J., concur.
The relevant facts, including a detailed description of the parties involved in both the underlying litigation and the current appeal, may be found in
Workman I
. See
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
821 S.E.2d 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rl-bb-acq-i-ga-cvl-llc-v-workman-et-al-gactapp-2018.