R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Ciccone

189 So. 3d 368, 2016 WL 2744996, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7177
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Ciccone. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12726
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 11, 2016·No. No. 4D11-3807·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

Consistent with the Florida Supreme Court’s opinions in Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 187 So.3d 1219 (Fla.2016), and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Ciccone, No. SC13-2415, 2016 WL 1163361 (Fla. Mar. 24, 2016), we affirm the final judgment in all respects.

CIKLIN, C.J., GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Ciccone, 189 So. 3d 368, 2016 WL 2744996, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7177 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

189 So. 3d 368 (R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Ciccone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lucille Ruth Soffer, etc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
187 So. 3d 1219 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Pamela Ciccone, etc.
190 So. 3d 1028 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)