Riviere v. Banner Chevrolet Inc

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Riviere v. Banner Chevrolet Inc. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 F.3d 727
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 22, 2001·No. 00-30869·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-30869 Summary Calendar

STEFANIE RIVIERE; THOMAS STURDEVANT,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

BANNER CHEVROLET, INC.; ET AL.,

Defendant,

BANNER CHEVROLET, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (USDC No. 95-CV-3816-T) _______________________________________________________ January 19, 2001

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Stefanie Riviere and Thomas Sturdevant appeal from the judgment of the district

court dismissing their claim under the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-77. The

district court has made the determination directed by the panel of this court on the prior

appeal. The finding that the truck’s purchase was made for business purposes is not

clearly erroneous. The Act does not apply.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riviere v. Banner Chevrolet Inc, (5th Cir. 2001).

Riviere v. Banner Chevrolet Inc (Riviere v. Banner Chevrolet Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 1601-77
15 U.S.C. § 1601-77
§ 1601
15 U.S.C. § 1601