Riverside Towers, Inc. v. Riverside Development Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Riverside Towers, Inc. v. Riverside Development Corp.

310 So. 2d 44, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13952

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 14, 1975

DocketNo. 74-1677

StatusPublished

This text of 310 So. 2d 44 (Riverside Towers, Inc. v. Riverside Development Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riverside Towers, Inc. v. Riverside Development Corp., 310 So. 2d 44, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13952 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs of the parties and the record herein we are of the opinion that the trial court’s order permitting the filing of an amended answer and counterclaim seeking attorney’s fees some seven months after final judgment was an [45]*45abuse of discretion, Aydelott v. Greenheart (Demerara) Inc., 162 So.2d 286 (Fla.App.1964) ; see also Milgen Development, Inc. v. Goodman, 302 So.2d 491 (Fla.App.1974). Accordingly, the order granting defend-antis motion for leave to file an amended answer and counterclaim for attorney’s fees is vacated and set aside.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs of the parties and the record herein we are of the opinion that the trial court’s order permitting the filing of an amended answer and counterclaim seeking attorney’s fees some seven months after final judgment was an [45]*45abuse of discretion, Aydelott v. Greenheart (Demerara) Inc., 162 So.2d 286 (Fla.App.1964) ; see also Milgen Development, Inc. v. Goodman, 302 So.2d 491 (Fla.App.1974). Accordingly, the order granting defend-antis motion for leave to file an amended answer and counterclaim for attorney’s fees is vacated and set aside.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

310 So. 2d 44, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riverside-towers-inc-v-riverside-development-corp-fladistctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack