Aydelott v. Greenheart (Demerara) Inc.

162 So. 2d 286, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4610
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 1964·No. No. 4269·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals an order denying his motion for leave to file a counterclaim long subsequent to entry of a summary judgment for the plaintiff. The motion was denied on the ground that the proposed counterclaim was in the nature of a compulsory counterclaim and was not seasonably filed under Rule 1.13(1), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A.

It appears that the matters attempted to be raised by the tardy counterclaim were essentially within the knowledge of the defendant at the time he filed his answer and under such circumstances we find no error.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aydelott v. Greenheart (Demerara) Inc., 162 So. 2d 286, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4610 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

162 So. 2d 286 (Aydelott v. Greenheart (Demerara) Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riverside Towers, Inc. v. Riverside Development Corp.
310 So. 2d 44 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)