Rivers v. State

57 Ga. 28
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 57 Ga. 28 (Rivers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rivers v. State, 57 Ga. 28 (Ga. 1876).

Opinion

Jackson, Judge.

The indictment described the hog stolen as a black hog, mark unknown, of the value of $4 00, and the property of one G. K. & T. R. Taylor. The court below held it good, and error is assigned to this judgment.

The Code is very broad; the only description necessary is such as that the owner may identify the hog, and this was done in this case: See Code, section 4400 ; 44 Georgia Reports, 300.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunter v. State
56 S.E.2d 199 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Phillips v. State
199 S.E. 342 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Pharr v. State
161 S.E. 643 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Williamson v. State
111 S.E. 683 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Garrett v. State
95 S.E. 301 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Adams v. State
94 S.E. 82 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Geiger v. State
93 S.E. 1027 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Harvey v. State
49 S.E. 674 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Ga. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivers-v-state-ga-1876.