Rivers v. State
57 Ga. 28
Opinion
The indictment described the hog stolen as a black hog, mark unknown, of the value of $4 00, and the property of one G. K. & T. R. Taylor. The court below held it good, and error is assigned to this judgment.
The Code is very broad; the only description necessary is such as that the owner may identify the hog, and this was done in this case: See Code, section 4400 ; 44 Georgia Reports, 300.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rivers v. State, 57 Ga. 28 (Ga. 1876).
57 Ga. 28 (Rivers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hunter v. State
56 S.E.2d 199 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Phillips v. State
199 S.E. 342 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Pharr v. State
161 S.E. 643 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Williamson v. State
111 S.E. 683 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Garrett v. State
95 S.E. 301 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Adams v. State
94 S.E. 82 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Geiger v. State
93 S.E. 1027 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Harvey v. State
49 S.E. 674 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)