Harvey v. State
This text of 49 S.E. 674 (Harvey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. An indictment for simple larceny, which charges the accused with stealing “one black and white male hog,'of the personal goods” of a named person, sets forth a legally sufficient description of the stolen property. Brown v. State, 44 Ga. 300 ; Rivers v. State, 57 Ga. 28.
2. “ The failure to charge a proposition of law applicable to the case can not be taken advantage of by assigning error upon a charge which is abstractly correct.” Roberts v. State, 114 Ga. 450.
3. The evidence authorized the conviction of the accused, and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in declining to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 S.E. 674, 121 Ga. 590, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-v-state-ga-1905.