Rivers v. State
109 So. 3d 882, 2013 WL 1136402, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4453
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rivers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13460 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Chaidez v. United States, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1103, 185 L.Ed.2d 149 (2013) (holding that Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroac[883]*883tively); Hernandez v. State, — So.3d -(Fla.2012) (same).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rivers v. State, 109 So. 3d 882, 2013 WL 1136402, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4453 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
109 So. 3d 882 (Rivers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Chaidez v. United States
133 S. Ct. 1103 (Supreme Court, 2013)