Rivers v. State
109 So. 3d 882, 2013 WL 1136402, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4453
This text of 109 So. 3d 882 (Rivers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rivers v. State, 109 So. 3d 882, 2013 WL 1136402, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4453 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Chaidez v. United States, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1103, 185 L.Ed.2d 149 (2013) (holding that Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroac[883]*883tively); Hernandez v. State, — So.3d -(Fla.2012) (same).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Chaidez v. United States
133 S. Ct. 1103 (Supreme Court, 2013)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
109 So. 3d 882, 2013 WL 1136402, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivers-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.