Rivera v. State

109 So. 3d 847, 2013 WL 856716, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3764
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rivera v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6573
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 2013·No. No. 1D12-6002·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has sought review of an Order Denying Motion to Remove Lien. Review of such an order would ordinarily be called up for review in an appeal from the final order entered concluding the action below. Mathews v. Risk Management, 16 So.3d 230 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Here, however, no final order has yet been entered. See Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (dismissing appeal as premature where order granted motion to dismiss without dismissing action). Thus, the appeal is premature and must be dismissed. The dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek review upon the rendition of a final order disposing of the petition for writ of mandamus.

BENTON, C.J., WOLF and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rivera v. State, 109 So. 3d 847, 2013 WL 856716, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3764 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

109 So. 3d 847 (Rivera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mathews v. RISK MANAGEMENT
16 So. 3d 230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Benton v. Moore
655 So. 2d 1272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)