Rivera v. State
90 So. 3d 348, 2012 WL 2159253, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9706
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rivera v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6573 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Flowers v. State, 899 So.2d 1257 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (holding that when, as in the instant case, the trial court orders that probation is to commence after the defendant’s release from prison, the split sentences of incarceration and probation imposed in multiple counts do not overlap and the sentence is legal).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rivera v. State, 90 So. 3d 348, 2012 WL 2159253, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9706 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
90 So. 3d 348 (Rivera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flowers v. State
899 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)