Rivera v. Southern Am. Fire Ins. Co.

361 So. 2d 193
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 5, 1978
Docket77-1852
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 361 So. 2d 193 (Rivera v. Southern Am. Fire Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rivera v. Southern Am. Fire Ins. Co., 361 So. 2d 193 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

361 So.2d 193 (1978)

Aileen RIVERA, a Minor, by and through Her Father and Next Friend, Domingo Rivera, and Domingo Rivera, Individually, Appellants,
v.
SOUTHERN AMERICAN FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc., Appellees.

No. 77-1852.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 5, 1978.
Rehearing Denied August 25, 1978.

Freidin & Goldfarb and Philip Freidin, Miami, for appellants.

Preddy, Kutner & Hardy and Stephen T. Brown, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, Rivera, obtained a $53,000.00 judgment against Southern American Fire Insurance Company and its insured. Southern American thereafter became insolvent, and the Riveras sought to recover the excess over the policy limits of $25,000.00 from Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc. (FIGA), alleging Southern *194 American had dealt in bad faith with the plaintiffs-appellants. The trial court dismissed the complaint. We affirm.

The trial court was correct, because FIGA is not liable for any amounts in excess of policy limits and is not vicariously liable for tortious acts of members' insurers. Section 631.57(1)(a)3 Florida Statutes (1975).

The appellants rely heavily upon the case of Zinke-Smith, Inc. v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc., 304 So.2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). We find this not to be persuasive because the attorney's fee recovery therein was permitted by another statute.

Therefore, the final order of dismissal here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Inc.
908 So. 2d 435 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Veillon v. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n
608 So. 2d 670 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1992)
Bentley v. North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
418 S.E.2d 705 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1992)
Williams v. Champion Ins. Co.
590 So. 2d 736 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
Gauthier v. Champion Ins. Co.
583 So. 2d 556 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
Williams v. FLORIDA INS. GUAR. ASS'N
549 So. 2d 253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Williams v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
549 So. 2d 253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Segarra v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
447 So. 2d 260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Fernandez v. Florida Ins. Guaranty Ass'n
383 So. 2d 974 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Carrazana v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
374 So. 2d 581 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Vaughn v. Vaughn
597 P.2d 932 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1979)
Ruiz v. Fernandez
370 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Duarte v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
364 So. 2d 479 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 So. 2d 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-v-southern-am-fire-ins-co-fladistctapp-1978.