Rivera v. Mitchell

D.C. Circuit

Rivera v. Mitchell

244 F.2d 783, 1958 A.M.C. 199

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided May 29, 1957·No. No. 13680·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff was injured by enemy action in 1942, when he was a seaman on a ship of the United States Lines Company. He brought this action because the appellees denied part of his claim under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. The District Court correctly dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. § 42 of the Act as amended, 59 Stat. 503, 504, 5 U.S.C.A. § 793.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff was injured by enemy action in 1942, when he was a seaman on a ship of the United States Lines Company. He brought this action because the appellees denied part of his claim under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. The District Court correctly dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. § 42 of the Act as amended, 59 Stat. 503, 504, 5 U.S.C.A. § 793.

Affirmed.

Rivera v. Mitchell, 244 F.2d 783, 1958 A.M.C. 199 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Pincite

244 F.2d 783 (Rivera v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related