Rivera v. Mitchell

D.C. Circuit

Rivera v. Mitchell

244 F.2d 783, 1958 A.M.C. 199

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 29, 1957

DocketNo. 13680

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 244 F.2d 783 (Rivera v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rivera v. Mitchell, 244 F.2d 783, 1958 A.M.C. 199 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff was injured by enemy action in 1942, when he was a seaman on a ship of the United States Lines Company. He brought this action because the appellees denied part of his claim under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. The District Court correctly dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. § 42 of the Act as amended, 59 Stat. 503, 504, 5 U.S.C.A. § 793.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff was injured by enemy action in 1942, when he was a seaman on a ship of the United States Lines Company. He brought this action because the appellees denied part of his claim under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. The District Court correctly dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. § 42 of the Act as amended, 59 Stat. 503, 504, 5 U.S.C.A. § 793.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 F.2d 783, 1958 A.M.C. 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-v-mitchell-cadc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack