Rafael Rivera v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor and Appeals Board of the Employees' Compensation Bureau

244 F.2d 783, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 335, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3161
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 29, 1957
Docket13680
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 F.2d 783 (Rafael Rivera v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor and Appeals Board of the Employees' Compensation Bureau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rafael Rivera v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor and Appeals Board of the Employees' Compensation Bureau, 244 F.2d 783, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 335, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3161 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Opinion

244 F.2d 783

100 U.S.App.D.C. 335

Rafael RIVERA, Appellant,
v.
James P. MITCHELL, Secretary of Labor and Appeals Board of
the Employees' Compensation Bureau, Appellees.

No. 13680.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued May 20, 1957.
Decided May 29, 1957.

Mr. Jesse L. Rosenberg, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave the Court, with whom Mr. William C. Koplovitz, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Herbert E. Morris, Attorney, Department of Justice, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Connecticut, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub and Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Melvin Richter, Attorney, Department of Justice, were on the brief, for appellees. Mr. Lewis Carroll, Asst. U.S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellees.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WILBUR K. MILLER and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff was injured by enemy action in 1942, when he was a seaman on a ship of the United States Lines Company. He brought this action because the appellees denied part of his claim under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act. The District Court correctly dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. § 42 of the Act as amended, 59 Stat. 503, 504, 5 U.S.C.A. § 793.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 F.2d 783, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 335, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rafael-rivera-v-james-p-mitchell-secretary-of-labor-and-appeals-board-of-cadc-1957.