Rivera v. Gonzales

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rivera v. Gonzales. Read the opinion of the Court — 195 F. App'x 191
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2006·No. 06-6895·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6895

VINCENT F. RIVERA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ALBERTO GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Judicial Conference of the USA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (1:05-cv-00246-TSE)

Submitted: July 31, 2006 Decided: August 24, 2006

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent F. Rivera, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Vincent F. Rivera appeals the district court’s order

denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion in which he sought relief

from the judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Rivera v. Gonzales, No. 1:05-cv-00246-TSE (E.D. Va. filed

Apr. 24, 2006; entered Apr. 25, 2006). We deny Rivera’s motion for

appointment of counsel and his motion to supplement the record.

Further, we deny as moot Rivera’s motion to expedite the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rivera v. Gonzales, (4th Cir. 2006).

Rivera v. Gonzales (Rivera v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related