Rivera v. Gonzales

Fourth Circuit

Rivera v. Gonzales

195 F. App'x 191

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2006·No. No. 06-6895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Vincent F. Rivera appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion in which he sought relief from the judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rivera v. Gonzales, No. l:05-cv-00246-TSE (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 24, 2006; entered Apr. 25, 2006). We deny Rivera’s motion for appointment of counsel and his motion to supplement the record. Further, we deny as moot Rivera’s motion to expedite the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Vincent F. Rivera appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion in which he sought relief from the judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rivera v. Gonzales, No. l:05-cv-00246-TSE (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 24, 2006; entered Apr. 25, 2006). We deny Rivera’s motion for appointment of counsel and his motion to supplement the record. Further, we deny as moot Rivera’s motion to expedite the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rivera v. Gonzales, 195 F. App'x 191 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

195 F. App'x 191 (Rivera v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related