Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION

TRACY LOUISE RIVERA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:21-cv-623-JRK

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant. / ORDER This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. No. 24; “Motion”), filed February 16, 2023. In the Motion, Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) in the amount of $3,281.45. Motion at 1-3, 5. Plaintiff represents that Defendant does not oppose the relief requested. Id. at 3. Plaintiff’s counsel indicates a total of 14.1 hours were expended by two attorneys in the representation of Plaintiff before the Court: 1.1 hours by attorney Richard A. Culbertson in 2021 and 2022; and 13.0 hours by attorney Sarah P. Jacobs in 2021 through 2023. Id. at 2, 7; see id. at 11-12 (attached Schedules of Hours). Plaintiff requests an hourly rate of $217.53 for 2021 and $234.95 for 2022 and 2023. Id. at 2, 7. Plaintiff is seeking a higher hourly rate than the $125 specified by statute based on the increase in the cost of living since 1996, when the attorney’s fee rate was last adjusted by Congress. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A) (permitting fee awards at rates higher than $125 per

hour upon the Court’s determination that cost of living has increased). Having examined the Consumer Price Index and the representations made in the Motion, the Court concludes an increase in inflation does justify a proportionate increase in attorneys’ fees.1 Further, the number of hours expended is

reasonable. Plaintiff has assigned her rights to any entitlement of attorney’s fees due under the EAJA to her counsel. Motion at 2; Retainer Agreement (Doc. No. 24- 1). Plaintiff represents as follows regarding the assignment:

[A]fter the Court issues an order awarding EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. If the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the government will accept Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and pay fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel.

Motion at 2. In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED:

1 See U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Inflation Calculator, http://data.bls.gov/cgi- bin/cpicalc.pl (last visited April 10, 2023). In computing the hourly rate adjustment for the cost of living increase, the Consumer Price Index is generally used for the year in which the services were performed. See Masonry Masters, Inc. v. Nelson, 105 F.3d 708, 710-13 (D.C. Cir. 1997); see also Gates v. Barnhart, No. 5:01-cv-148-GRJ, 2002 WL 1452232, at *3 (M.D. Fla. June 25, 2002) (unpublished). 1. Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. No. 24) is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for attorney’s fees in the amount of $3,281.45 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). 3. The Commissioner may exercise the discretion to honor Plaintiffs assignment of fees to counsel if the U.S. Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt to the U.S. Government. DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida on April 10, 2023.

Verge Boo KAS JAMES R. KLINDT United States Magistrate Judge

kaw Copies to: Counsel of Record