Rivas v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rivas v. New York City Housing Authority

188 A.D.2d 390, 591 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14282

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1992·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.), entered on or about February 11, 1992, which granted petitioner’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

The instant application was made within 30 days after [391] expiration of the 90-day time limit, and alleges that petitioner fell outside her apartment door as a result of respondent’s negligence in maintaining the hallway. In exercising their broad discretion under General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) to grant leave to file a late notice of claim, the courts consider all relevant factors, including the length of the delay. Where, as here, the delay is relatively short, and the municipality cannot show prejudice, it is not an abuse of discretion to grant leave (see, Matter of Sutton v Town of Schuyler Falls, 185 AD2d 430). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.), entered on or about February 11, 1992, which granted petitioner’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

The instant application was made within 30 days after [391] expiration of the 90-day time limit, and alleges that petitioner fell outside her apartment door as a result of respondent’s negligence in maintaining the hallway. In exercising their broad discretion under General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) to grant leave to file a late notice of claim, the courts consider all relevant factors, including the length of the delay. Where, as here, the delay is relatively short, and the municipality cannot show prejudice, it is not an abuse of discretion to grant leave (see, Matter of Sutton v Town of Schuyler Falls, 185 AD2d 430). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Rivas v. New York City Housing Authority, 188 A.D.2d 390, 591 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

188 A.D.2d 390 (Rivas v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related