Ahferom v. Dormitory Authority

282 A.D.2d 343, 723 N.Y.S.2d 367, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3895
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Giamboi, J.), entered October 31, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant Dormitory Authority’s motion [344] to strike and granted plaintiffs cross motion to file a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Where, as here, the delay is relatively short, and the public entity opposing late notice makes no showing of resultant prejudice, the grant of leave to file a late notice of claim constitutes a proper exercise of discretion pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (see, Matter of Thornhill v New York City Hous. Auth., 232 AD2d 317; Matter of Rivas v New York City Hous. Auth., 188 AD2d 390). Defendant-appellant’s claim that the motion court was without jurisdiction to entertain plaintiffs cross motion is plainly without merit (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [7]). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ahferom v. Dormitory Authority, 282 A.D.2d 343, 723 N.Y.S.2d 367, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

282 A.D.2d 343 (Ahferom v. Dormitory Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gomez v. City of White Plains
300 A.D.2d 282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Bennett v. Mele
295 A.D.2d 604 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)