Ritter v. Mason

11 Cal. 214
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 Cal. 214 (Ritter v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ritter v. Mason, 11 Cal. 214 (Cal. 1858).

Opinion

Field, J., at the April Term, 1858, delivered the opinion of the Court

Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring.

The stipulations inserted in the transcript are not embodied in any statement or bill of exceptions, and form, therefore, no part of the record; and there is no certificate of the Judge or Clerk, or any admission of counsel, that the affidavits constitute the papers used on the motion to open the judgment. There is left for our consideration only the judgment roll, which discloses no error. Practice Act, section 346; Newland v. Kean, and Davis v. Stratton, January Term, 1856 ; Tates v. Buckingham, 4 Cal. 286.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Granite Mountain Mining Co. v. Weinstein
7 Mont. 346 (Montana Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Cal. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritter-v-mason-cal-1858.