Ritter v. Mason
This text of 11 Cal. 214 (Ritter v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring.
The stipulations inserted in the transcript are not embodied in any statement or bill of exceptions, and form, therefore, no part of the record; and there is no certificate of the Judge or Clerk, or any admission of counsel, that the affidavits constitute the papers used on the motion to open the judgment. There is left for our consideration only the judgment roll, which discloses no error. Practice Act, section 346; Newland v. Kean, and Davis v. Stratton, January Term, 1856 ; Tates v. Buckingham, 4 Cal. 286.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Cal. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritter-v-mason-cal-1858.