Gates v. Buckingham

California Supreme Court

Gates v. Buckingham

4 Cal. 286

California Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 1854·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Ch. J. Murray

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt concurred.

[287] This appeal is presented from an order of the Court below re-taxing costs.

The record contains various notices and affidavits, which are not, however, embodied in a bill of exceptions or statement, so that we are uninformed upon what the Court acted. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed, on the presumption that the Court below decided correctly upon all the evidence before it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Ch. J. Murray

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt concurred.

[287] This appeal is presented from an order of the Court below re-taxing costs.

The record contains various notices and affidavits, which are not, however, embodied in a bill of exceptions or statement, so that we are uninformed upon what the Court acted. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed, on the presumption that the Court below decided correctly upon all the evidence before it.

Gates v. Buckingham, 4 Cal. 286 (Cal. 1854).

Pincite

4 Cal. 286 (Gates v. Buckingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related