Rittenbery v. Eddins

272 So. 2d 840, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7437
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 13, 1973
DocketNo. O-104
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 272 So. 2d 840 (Rittenbery v. Eddins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rittenbery v. Eddins, 272 So. 2d 840, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7437 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS, J., concur. WIGGINTON, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mathis ex rel. Mathis v. Adler
295 So. 2d 652 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Orfaly v. Jeffries
290 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Rittenbery v. Eddins
277 So. 2d 534 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 So. 2d 840, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rittenbery-v-eddins-fladistctapp-1973.