Mathis ex rel. Mathis v. Adler

295 So. 2d 652, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7114
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 4, 1974·No. No. 73-1091·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an adverse final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in a case where the minor plaintiff was injured by an automobile. The record reveals that the plaintiff requested a charge on comparative negligence and the charge was refused. A [653]*653charge on contributory negligence was given. The failure to give the comparative negligence charge and the giving of the contributory negligence charge is assigned as erro'r.

Under the circumstances reflected by the record, this case must be reversed for a new trial. See Hoffman v. Jones, Fla. 1973, 280 So.2d 431. Thornton v. Elliott, Fla. 1973, 288 So.2d 254; Butler v. Woolco Department Store, Fla.App.1973, 284 So.2d 434; Rittenbery v. Eddins, Fla.App.1973, 272 So.2d 840.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mathis ex rel. Mathis v. Adler, 295 So. 2d 652, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7114 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

295 So. 2d 652 (Mathis ex rel. Mathis v. Adler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoffman v. Jones
280 So. 2d 431 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Thornton v. Elliott
288 So. 2d 254 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Butler v. Woolco Department Store
284 So. 2d 434 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Rittenbery v. Eddins
272 So. 2d 840 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)