Ripley v. Buchanan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ripley v. Buchanan

87 S.E. 156, 17 Ga. App. 383, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 436

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 2, 1915

Docket6292

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 87 S.E. 156 (Ripley v. Buchanan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ripley v. Buchanan, 87 S.E. 156, 17 Ga. App. 383, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 436 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

BrOyles, J.

It being expressly provided in section 42 (g) of the act creating the municipal court of Atlanta (Acts 1913, p. 169) that bills of exceptions to the Court of Appeals shall be certified by the chief judge of the municipal court, and there being no other provision in the act for the verification of bills of exceptions, a writ of error from the appellate’ division of the municipal court of Atlanta, certified, by any other than the chief judge of that court, fails to confer jurisdiction upon this court, and the writ of error must be dismissed. The rule is so exclusive that the case is not altered although the chief judge could not, or did not as a matter of fact, preside in the trial in the appellate division. Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BrOyles, J.

It being expressly provided in section 42 (g) of the act creating the municipal court of Atlanta (Acts 1913, p. 169) that bills of exceptions to the Court of Appeals shall be certified by the chief judge of the municipal court, and there being no other provision in the act for the verification of bills of exceptions, a writ of error from the appellate’ division of the municipal court of Atlanta, certified, by any other than the chief judge of that court, fails to confer jurisdiction upon this court, and the writ of error must be dismissed. The rule is so exclusive that the case is not altered although the chief judge could not, or did not as a matter of fact, preside in the trial in the appellate division. Writ of error dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 S.E. 156, 17 Ga. App. 383, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ripley-v-buchanan-gactapp-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack