Rios v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

30 P.3d 1227, 176 Or. App. 252, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1249
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 22, 2001·No. 84-672; A104844·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB), upon remand to the Board from the Supreme Court, Rios v. PSRB, 325 Or 151, 934 P2d 399 (1997), that continued petitioner’s commitment at a state hospital. See ORS 161.341. We write only to address petitioner’s contention that an Axis I diagnosis of pedophilia or of alcohol abuse cannot constitute a “mental disease or defect” for purposes of ORS 161.341(4), in that those conditions are excluded by ORS 161.295(2)1 We reject that argument for the reasons stated in the en banc lead opinion in Hanson v. PSRB, 156 Or App 198,965 P2d 1051 (1998), rev’d and rent’d on other grounds 331 Or 626, 19 P3d 350 (2001).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rios v. Psychiatric Security Review Board, 30 P.3d 1227, 176 Or. App. 252, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1249 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

30 P.3d 1227 (Rios v. Psychiatric Security Review Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rios v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
30 P.3d 1227 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2001)