Rios-Rosa v. Christenson

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION ANGEL RIOS-ROSA, ) Plaintiff, v. No. 1:22-CV-145 SNLJ JOHN CHRISTENSON, et al., Defendants, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. [ECF No. 8]. When the Court dismissed this action, it certified in writing that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, see ECF Nos. 4 & 5; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), and it is not apparent that plaintiff now seeks appellate review of any issue that is not frivolous. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). As a result, the Court will deny the motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. 8] is DENIED. Dated this 29" day of November, 2022. LE q Lf

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE