Rinaldi v. Mongiello

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Rinaldi v. Mongiello

71 A.2d 404, 6 N.J. Super. 387

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedFebruary 15, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A.2d 404 (Rinaldi v. Mongiello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rinaldi v. Mongiello, 71 A.2d 404, 6 N.J. Super. 387 (N.J. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

6 N.J. Super. 387 (1950) 71 A.2d 404

DOMINICK R. RINALDI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
STEPHEN E. MONGIELLO, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE AND FINANCE OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, AND CITY OF HOBOKEN IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 30, 1950. Decided February 15, 1950.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, COLIE and EASTWOOD.

Mr. Albert J. Shea argued the cause for defendants-appellants.

*388 Mr. Nicholas S. Schloeder argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William J. Brennan, Jr., and reported in 7 N.J. Super. 410.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

6 N.J. Super. 387 (1950) 71 A.2d 404

DOMINICK R. RINALDI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
STEPHEN E. MONGIELLO, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE AND FINANCE OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, AND CITY OF HOBOKEN IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 30, 1950. Decided February 15, 1950.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, COLIE and EASTWOOD.

Mr. Albert J. Shea argued the cause for defendants-appellants.

*388 Mr. Nicholas S. Schloeder argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William J. Brennan, Jr., and reported in 7 N.J. Super. 410.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.2d 404, 6 N.J. Super. 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rinaldi-v-mongiello-njsuperctappdiv-1950.

Opinion

DOMINICK R. RINALDI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STEPHEN E. MONGIELLO, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE AND FINANCE OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, AND CITY OF HOBOKEN IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

DOMINICK R. RINALDI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
STEPHEN E. MONGIELLO, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE AND FINANCE OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, AND CITY OF HOBOKEN IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.