Rims Barber v. Phil Bryant

872 F.3d 671
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 29, 2017·No. 16-60477, 16-60478·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Treating the petitions for rehearing en banc as petitions for panel rehearing, the petitions for panel rehearing are DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of a member of the court, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor (Fed. R. App. P. 35 and 5th Cíe. R. 35), the petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

In the poll, 2 judges vote in favor of rehearing en banc, and 12 vote against. Voting in favor are Judges Dennis and Graves. Voting against are Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly, Jones, Smith, Clement, Prado, Owen, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Higginson, and Costa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rims Barber v. Phil Bryant, 872 F.3d 671 (5th Cir. 2017).

872 F.3d 671 (Rims Barber v. Phil Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doe v. Hood
345 F. Supp. 3d 749 (S.D. Mississippi, 2018)