Riley v. State
838 So. 2d 1208, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2559, 2003 WL 728344
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 2003·No. No. 2D01-5621·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the revocation of Orentha Riley’s probation but remand for correction of the order of revocation. The order of revocation states that Riley admitted to violating his probation. In fact, the trial court held an evidentiary hearing and revoked Riley’s probation over his objections. Therefore, on remand, the trial court must enter a corrected written order reflecting that the trial court revoked Riley’s probation.
Affirmed, but remanded for correction of the order of revocation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riley v. State, 838 So. 2d 1208, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2559, 2003 WL 728344 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
838 So. 2d 1208 (Riley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edwards v. State
206 So. 3d 123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)