Riley v. State

828 So. 2d 441, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15100, 2002 WL 31306960

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Phillippian Henry Riley challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.

In his motion, Riley alleged that his plea was involuntary because defense counsel affirmatively misadvised him regarding the future senteneing-enhancing effects of the plea in regard to an as yet uncommitted crime. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel. We affirm, without discussion, any other issues raised by Riley in his motion.

PARKER, WHATLEY, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.