Riley v. Skidmore

6 N.Y.S. 107, 2 Silv. Sup. 573, 24 N.Y. St. Rep. 724, 53 Hun 632, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 425
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 2, 1889·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pratt, J.

The affidavit made before the justice stated facts sufficient to call for an exercise of his judicial discretion. That gave him jurisdiction to issue the attachment. There is no evidence of any abuse of the process. The property attached was not enough to satisfy the execution. The permission accorded to the plaintiffs by the justice of the peace to file an amended undertaking nunc pro tune was within his power, and was in furtherance of justice. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riley v. Skidmore, 6 N.Y.S. 107, 2 Silv. Sup. 573, 24 N.Y. St. Rep. 724, 53 Hun 632, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 425 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

6 N.Y.S. 107 (Riley v. Skidmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dale v. Gilbert
12 N.Y.S. 370 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Bartlett v. Bunn
5 Silv. Sup. 87 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)