Riggins v. State
This text of 197 S.E.2d 154 (Riggins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was tried and convicted of automobile theft and was sentenced to ten years in the penitentiary. His motion for new trial on the general grounds only was overruled and he appealed. His sole enumeration of error was to the overruling of the motion for new trial.
1. The evidence was amply sufficient to support the verdict and there was no error in overruling the motion for new trial.
2. Appellant, in his brief, argues an alleged error in the pre-sentence hearing, but there being no enumeration of error relating to such alleged error, this court is without jurisdiction to consider it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 S.E.2d 154, 128 Ga. App. 478, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riggins-v-state-gactapp-1973.