Franks v. Reid
197 S.E.2d 154, 128 Ga. App. 454, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1510
Opinion
1. Where, as in this case, counsel for the plaintiff announced ready for trial, it was error for the trial judge to dismiss the action for want of prosecution based on the fact that the plaintiff himself was not present. Johnston v. Dollar, 89 Ga. App. 876 (4) (81 SE2d 502).
2. The remaining enumeration of error is without merit.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Franks v. Reid, 197 S.E.2d 154, 128 Ga. App. 454, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1510 (Ga. Ct. App. 1973).
197 S.E.2d 154 (Franks v. Reid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eriksen v. Mobay Corp.
41 P.3d 488 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2002)
Long v. Cochran
277 S.E.2d 25 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Elmer Fox, Westheimer & Company v. Bx Corporation
246 S.E.2d 413 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Riggins v. State
197 S.E.2d 154 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)