Rigg v. State
190 So. 3d 656, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4877, 2016 WL 1239870
Opinion
Affirmed. See § 705.105, Fla. Stat. (2015); Harris v. State, 30 So.3d 674 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
As the appellant’s motion in the circuit court and this appeal are successive, the appellant is cautioned that further successive and non-meritorious filings may subject him to sanctions. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2015), and Spencer v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 823 So.2d 752 (Fla.2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rigg v. State, 190 So. 3d 656, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4877, 2016 WL 1239870 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
190 So. 3d 656 (Rigg v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Spencer v. Florida Dept. of Corrections
823 So. 2d 752 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Harris v. State
30 So. 3d 674 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)