Rigg v. State
190 So. 3d 656, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4877, 2016 WL 1239870
This text of 190 So. 3d 656 (Rigg v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rigg v. State, 190 So. 3d 656, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4877, 2016 WL 1239870 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
Opinion
Affirmed. See § 705.105, Fla. Stat. (2015); Harris v. State, 30 So.3d 674 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
As the appellant’s motion in the circuit court and this appeal are successive, the appellant is cautioned that further successive and non-meritorious filings may subject him to sanctions. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2015), and Spencer v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 823 So.2d 752 (Fla.2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Spencer v. Florida Dept. of Corrections
823 So. 2d 752 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Harris v. State
30 So. 3d 674 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
190 So. 3d 656, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4877, 2016 WL 1239870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rigg-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.