Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Harris v. State

Harris v. State

49 So. 3d 865, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19451, 2010 WL 5174347
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 22, 2010
DocketNo. 4D10-665
StatusPublished

This text of 49 So. 3d 865 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. State, 49 So. 3d 865, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19451, 2010 WL 5174347 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We summarily affirm the circuit court’s denial of Harris’s rule 3.800(a) motion to [866]*866correct an illegal sentence and motion for rehearing, which the court construed to be a rule 3.850 motion. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. We caution Harris that the filing of successive or otherwise procedurally barred claims will result in proceedings to determine appropriate sanctions. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 So. 3d 865, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19451, 2010 WL 5174347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.