Riedman Corporation v. Jarosh

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Riedman Corporation v. Jarosh

349 S.E.2d 404, 290 S.C. 252, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 428

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedOctober 13, 1986

Docket22619

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 349 S.E.2d 404 (Riedman Corporation v. Jarosh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riedman Corporation v. Jarosh, 349 S.E.2d 404, 290 S.C. 252, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 428 (S.C. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, in Riedman Corp. v. Jarosh, 289 S. C. 191, 345 S. E. (2d) 732 (Ct. App. 1986). We grant the writ, dispense with further briefing, and affirm.

Respondent brought this action alleging that petitioner had breached a covenant not to compete contained in an at-will employment contract. The trial court sustained a demurrer on the ground that at-will employment is insufficient consideration to support a covenant not to compete. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the covenant was supported by sufficient consideration.

We now hold that a covenant not to compete may be enforced where the consideration is based solely upon at-will employment itself. Therefore, the Court of Appeals properly reversed the trial judge on this issue.

The remaining questions posed by the petitioner are without merit. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI