Ridley v. Ridley
32 A. 1008, 87 Me. 455, 1895 Me. LEXIS 78
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ridley v. Ridley. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 Me. 445 →
Opinion
In the case of the writ of entry, between the same parties, the court has held that the plaintiff was not entitled to the possession of the farm upon which the hay was cut, and that the defendant was, at the time óf the cutting, rightfully in possession. The title to the hay, therefore, was not in the plaintiff.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ridley v. Ridley, 32 A. 1008, 87 Me. 455, 1895 Me. LEXIS 78 (Me. 1895).
32 A. 1008 (Ridley v. Ridley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.