Ridley v. Ridley
32 A. 1008, 87 Me. 455, 1895 Me. LEXIS 78
This text of 32 A. 1008 (Ridley v. Ridley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ridley v. Ridley, 32 A. 1008, 87 Me. 455, 1895 Me. LEXIS 78 (Me. 1895).
Opinion
In the case of the writ of entry, between the same parties, the court has held that the plaintiff was not entitled to the possession of the farm upon which the hay was cut, and that the defendant was, at the time óf the cutting, rightfully in possession. The title to the hay, therefore, was not in the plaintiff.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 A. 1008, 87 Me. 455, 1895 Me. LEXIS 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridley-v-ridley-me-1895.